Honour School of Biological Sciences

Differences from 2020/21 to 2021/22

A

  • 1. The subject of the Honour School of Biological Sciences shall be the study of Biological Sciences.

  • 2. No candidate shall be admitted to examination in this school unless he or she has either passed or been exempted from the First Public Examination.

  • 3. The examination in this school shall be under the supervision of the Mathematical, Physical and Life Sciences Board, which shall prescribe the necessary regulations.

  • 4. The examination in Biological Sciences shall consist of Part I (taken at a time not less than two terms after passing the First Public Examination) and Part II (taken at a time not less than five terms after passing the First Public Examination).

  • 5. The name of a candidate shall not be published in a Results List until he or she has completed all parts of the examination. The examiners shall give due consideration to the performance in all parts of the respective examinations.

  • 6. Candidates will be expected to show knowledge based on practical work. This requirement shall normally be satisfied by the examiners’ assessment of the practical laboratory work done by candidates in Part I based on attendance records and/or marks awarded.

  • 7. Exceptionally, the examiners may require a candidate to submit all their practical notebooks.

  • 8. Candidates whose overall practical performance is not deemed satisfactory by the examiners may have their degree class reduced. If the work is judged by the examiners to be insufficient to warrant the award of Honours they may either be deemed to have failed the examination, or may, at the discretion of the examiners, be awarded a Pass.

B

  • 1. The subjects of the examination shall be those prescribed in the Regulations for Parts I and II.

  • 2. The examiners will permit the use of any hand-held calculator subject to the conditions set out under the heading ‘Use of calculators in examinations’ in the Regulations for the Conduct of University Examinations.

  • 3. Supplementary Subjects

    • (a) In addition, candidates may offer themselves for examination in one or more Supplementary Subjects.

    • (b) Candidates for Supplementary Subjects may offer themselves for examination in the academic year preceding that in which they take the Part II written examinations of the Final Honour School.

    • (c) Candidates awarded a pass in a Supplementary Subject examination may not retake the same Supplementary Subject examination.

    • (d) The Supplementary Subjects available in any year will be published, together with the term in which each subject will be examined, in the Final Honour School Handbook (Section 1) at the start of Michaelmas Term of the academic year in which the Supplementary Subjects may be taken.

PART I

  • 1. The examination for Part I shall normally be taken at the start of Trinity Term of the candidate’s second year.

  • 2. Further details of the requirements for Part I shall be set out in the Final Honour School Handbook (Section 1), which is published annually at the start of Michaelmas Term of the candidate’s second year.

  • 3. Written papers

    Assessment in Part I will consist of three written papers as follows. Knowledge of first year coursework will be assumed.

    • Paper 1: Evolution

    • Paper 2: Quantitative Methods

    • Paper 3: Essay Paper

      In Paper 3, candidates will be required to answer four questions, with no more than one from each of the following themes: (i) Animal Behaviour; (ii) Adaptations to the Environment; (iii) Cell and Developmental Biology; (iv) Disease; (v) Ecology; (vi) Plants and People.

  • The written papers for Part I may be taken only once.

  • 4. Practical Coursework

    All candidates shall be assessed as to their practical ability through their performance in three practical blocks. The following provisions apply:

    • (a) The Chair of the Biological Sciences Steering Committee, or a deputy, shall make available to the examiners, at the end of the first week of the term in which the written examinations in Part II are held, records showing the extent to which each candidate has completed the prescribed coursework to a satisfactory standard.

    • (b) The examiners may require a candidate to submit all their practical notebooks. Such candidates will be named in a list posted by the day of the first written paper in Part II of the examination. Each notebook submitted shall be accompanied by a certificate signed by the candidate indicating that the notebook is the candidate’s own work.

    • (c) In assessing the record of coursework undertaken, the examiners shall have regard to the attendance record of the candidates at the classes provided, and to the marks awarded for the classes provided.

  • 5. The examiners will issue a list of candidates deemed to have completed Part I of the examination, in the form of the completion of the three written papers, and satisfactory performance in the three practical blocks.

  • 6. Under exceptional circumstances, candidates who have not been able to complete sufficient practicals may be allowed to fulfil the practical requirement in their third year.

PART II

  • 1. The examination for Part II shall normally be taken during Trinity Term of the candidate’s third year.

  • 2. In Part II, a candidate who obtains only a pass, or fails to satisfy the examiners, may enter again for Part II of the examination on one, but no more than one, subsequent occasion.

  • 3. Further details of the requirements for Part II shall be set out in the Guidelines on Projects and Course Assignments and in the Final Honour School Handbook (Section 2). The Guidelines on Projects and Course Assignments are published annually at the end of Hilary Term of the candidate’s second year. The Final Honour School Handbook (Section 2) is published annually at the end of Hilary Term of the candidate’s second year.

  • 4. In Part II, candidates will select from a number of Options, and complete a Project Grant Proposal and two Course Assignments. The Options may be varied from time to time by the Biological Sciences Steering Committee, and such variations shall be notified by publication in the Final Honour School Handbook (Section 2) by the end of Week 8 of Hilary Term of the academic year preceding the first examination of the changed options. Each candidate will be expected to have studied at least six Options in order to address the requirements of Paper 6, and to have prepared sufficient of those Options in depth to be able to address the requirements of Papers 5 and 7.

  • 5. Assessment in Part II will consist of four written papers, each of three hours’ duration, submission of a Project Grant Proposal, and two Course Assignments, one of which will be examined as an Oral Presentation.

  • 6. Written papers

    Four written papers, each of three hours, will be set during Trinity Term of the third year. The papers will be as follows:

    • Paper 4: General Paper

    • Paper 5: Long Essay Paper

    • Paper 6: Short Essay Paper

    • Paper 7: Data Interpretation Paper

  • In the General Paper, candidates will be required to answer two questions and will be expected to bring together knowledge of different areas of Biology covered in the Course. In the Long Essay Paper, candidates will be required to answer three questions, with no more than one from any specific Option. In the Short Essay Paper, candidates will be required to answer six questions, with no more than one from any specific Option. In the Data Interpretation Paper, candidates will be required to answer four questions.

  • 7. Project Grant Proposal

    • (i) Form and subject of the project grant proposal.

      The project grant proposal requires students to write a grant proposal to undertake a 3 year research project. This should include a set of aims and objectives, supported by a background literature survey to present the current state-of-play related to the proposal. The research programme should detail the methodology proposed to address the main aims and objectives. Additional documentation is required that presents a timeline for the research, a justification of the resources requested, a management plan for the data collected, and an ethics statement if appropriate. When choosing a Project Grant Proposal, candidates must bear in mind the prohibition on duplicating material in different parts of the examination.

    • (ii) Registration

      Candidates must register the provisional title of their Project Grant Proposal and the name of their supervisor to the Examinations Co-ordinator no later than noon on Friday of Week 8 of Hilary Term of their second year. Candidates must submit their completed safety registration form to the appropriate Departmental Safety Officer by the same deadline.

    • (iii) Examination

      Candidates shall submit to the examiners a Research Grant Proposal according to guidelines published by Chair's Circular. The main text of the grant proposal does not have a word limit, but must not exceed 5 pages in length, in-line with typical research proposals to the main UK Research Councils. The proposal can include diagrams and images, provided it remains within the page limit.

    • (iv) Submission and assessment of Research Grant Proposal

    • The Research Grant Proposal must be word-processed (double line spacing to be used throughout, A4 paper format) and submitted on or before 12 noon on the Monday of Week 2 of Hilary Full Term of the academic year in which Part II of the examination is taken. The Research Grant Proposal must be uploaded to the Assignments section of the Biological Sciences WebLearn site. Each Research Grant Proposal must be certified as the candidate’s own work by following instructions provided by the WebLearn site. The procedure is described in the Guidelines on Projects and Course Assignments. No report will be accepted if it already has been submitted, wholly or substantially, for another Honour School or degree of this University, or for a degree of any other institution.

      In all cases, the examiners shall obtain and consider a written report from each supervisor indicating the extent of the input made by the candidate to the outcome of the Research Grant Proposal and also any unforeseen difficulties associated with the Research Grant Proposal. Material in a candidate’s dissertation must not duplicate material that has been included in the submitted Course Assignments.

  • 8. Course Assignments

    • (i) Form and subject of the Course Assignments

      Each candidate must complete two Course Assignments. One assignment shall be examined by means of a written essay, and one shall be examined by means of an Oral Presentation as set out below. The precise format of the Course Assignments will be specified by the Biological Sciences Steering Committee.

      The written essay shall be of not more than 3,000 words, excluding any tables, figures, or references, and must be prefaced by an Abstract of not more than 250 words, to be included within the word limit. All sources used in the essay must be fully documented. The Oral Presentation shall be a maximum of fifteen minutes in duration, followed by ten minutes of questions. The Oral Presentation should use appropriate audio-visual aids as specified in the Guidelines on Projects and Course Assignments. No hard copy may be submitted. Candidates shall also submit an Abstract of the Oral Presentation of not more than 500 words.

      Candidates may discuss the proposed topic for both the written essay and the Oral Presentation, the sources available, and the method of presentation with an adviser. The adviser for the written essay may also read and comment on a first draft. Candidates shall not deal with substantially the same material in their Course Assignments as is covered in their project report.

    • (ii) Registration

      Each assignment will be on a topic proposed by the student and approved by the Chair of the Biological Sciences Steering Committee. The approval of assignments shall be given not later than Friday of the seventh week of the Michaelmas Full Term of the academic year in which the examination is taken.

    • (iii) Authorship

      Each Course Assignment must be certified as the candidate’s own work. No Assignment will be accepted if it already has been submitted, wholly or substantially, for another Honour School or degree of this University, or for a degree of any other institution.

    • (iv) Submission

    • The written Course Assignment and the Abstract for the Oral Presentation must be uploaded to the Assignments section of the Biological Sciences WebLearn site by noon on Friday of 0th week of the Trinity Term of the academic year in which the examination is taken. The procedure is described in the Guidelines on Projects and Course Assignments. No hard copy may be submitted. Each essay and each Abstract shall clearly indicate on the first page the part of the examination and the subject under which the assignment is submitted.